Shapiro's lemma for group cohomology #
Given a commutative ring k and a finite index subgroup S ≤ G, the file
RepresentationTheory/FiniteIndex.lean defines a natural isomorphism between the functors
Ind_S^G, Coind_S^G : Rep k S ⥤ Rep k G.
Using this isomorphism, we conclude that the (Co)ind_S^G and Res(S) : Rep k G ⥤ Rep k S are
both left and right adjoint to each other, and thus that Res(S) is an exact functor which
preserves projective objects. In particular, given a projective resolution P of k as a trivial
k-linear G-representation, Res(S)(P) is a projective resolution of k as a trivial
k-linear S-representation.
Since Hom(Res(S)(P), A) ≅ Hom(P, Coind_S^G(A)) for any S-representation A, we conclude
Shapiro's lemma for group cohomology: Hⁿ(G, Coind_S^G(A)) ≅ Hⁿ(S, A) for all n.
Main definitions #
groupCohomology.coindIso A n: Shapiro's lemma for group cohomology: an isomorphismHⁿ(G, Coind_S^G(A)) ≅ Hⁿ(S, A), given a finite index subgroupS ≤ Gand anS-representationA.
!
Given a projective resolution P of k as a k-linear G-representation, a finite index
subgroup S ≤ G, and a k-linear S-representation A, this is an isomorphism of complexes
Hom(Res(S)(P), A) ≅ Hom(P, Coind_S^G(A)).
Equations
- groupCohomology.linearYonedaObjResProjectiveResolutionIso P A = HomologicalComplex.Hom.isoOfComponents (fun (x : ℕ) => (Rep.resCoindHomEquiv S.subtype (P.complex.X x) A).toModuleIso) ⋯
Instances For
Shapiro's lemma: given a finite index subgroup S ≤ G and an S-representation A, we have
Hⁿ(G, Coind_S^G(A)) ≅ Hⁿ(S, A).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.